Recently, Iran disclosed the extent of its missile arsenal during an attack on Israel. However, it is clear that Iran cannot engage in a direct air war with Israel due to Israel’s measured response to the attack.
A week after Iran launched over 300 missiles, cruise missiles, and drones at Israel, the Israeli armed forces responded with a limited air strike. This response exposed the military vulnerabilities of the Iranian regime. The Israeli forces used medium-range Blue Sparrow missiles for the attack, which are typically used for training purposes to test anti-aircraft systems. The range of these missiles allows Israel to target Iranian air force bases and nuclear facilities deep within the country.
The attack was carried out from rocket launch modules near Iraqi towns, indicating that Israel did not launch the attack from its own territory. The use of F-35 fighter jets enabled Israel to execute the attack swiftly and evade Iranian air defenses. The successful strike hit an anti-aircraft system at the Shekari air base, which is located near the Natanz nuclear facility. This facility had previously been targeted by Israeli sabotage.
Despite Iran’s efforts to modernize its air defense systems, Israel’s precision attack exposed weaknesses in Iranian defense capabilities. While Iran possesses a significant number of air defense systems, the exchange of blows with Israel highlighted the challenges Iran faces in defending against advanced weaponry. The ongoing shadow war between Iran and Israel underscores the reluctance of both sides to engage in a full-scale conflict.
In conclusion, while Iran may have revealed its missile arsenal during recent attacks on Israel, it is clear that it cannot engage in a direct air war with Israel due to limitations in its defense capabilities and lack of resources for advanced weaponry development and maintenance.
Israel has demonstrated that it can carry out precise attacks on deep within enemy territory using advanced weaponry such as F-35 fighter jets and Blue Sparrow missiles for training purposes. This highlights how important it is for countries with advanced weaponry capabilities to maintain their military strength and be prepared for any potential threat or conflict.
As tensions continue between these two nations, both sides must remain cautious and avoid any actions that could lead to a full-scale conflict or escalation of hostilities. Instead, they should focus on diplomacy and negotiation to resolve their differences peacefully and prevent further violence or harm.
Overall, while there may be many factors contributing to tensions between these two nations, it is clear that each side must prioritize maintaining its military strength while also working towards peaceful resolutions through diplomatic means.